DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford C-MaxSpecificationSaab 9-3
FordMakeSaab
C-MaxModel9-3
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford C-MaxSpecificationSaab 9-3
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford C-MaxSpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford C-MaxSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford C-MaxSpecificationSaab 9-3
4330 mmLength4635 mm
1820 mmWidth1762 mm
1600 mmHeight1466 mm
1391 KgWeight1440 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…