DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Nissan Laurel Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Laurel

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeNissan
9-3ModelLaurel
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower155 HP
240 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4765 mm
1762 mmWidth1730 mm
1466 mmHeight1400 mm
1440 KgWeight1390 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Nissan Laurel approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…