2002 • Nissan
Laurel
Nissan Laurel 2.0 24V (155 Hp) 2002Overall Score66.25/100
2002 Nissan Laurel vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 t (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Laurel
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan LaurelSpecificationSaab 9-3
NissanMakeSaab
LaurelModel9-3
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan LaurelSpecificationSaab 9-3
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
190 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
155 HPPower150 HP
186 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan LaurelSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank62 lt
13 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan LaurelSpecificationSaab 9-3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan LaurelSpecificationSaab 9-3
4765 mmLength4635 mm
1730 mmWidth1762 mm
1400 mmHeight1466 mm
1390 KgWeight1440 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Nissan Laurel and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…