2002 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 t (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi (130 Hp) 2002Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Saab 9-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord Mondeo
SaabMakeFord
9-3ModelMondeo
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord Mondeo
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
210 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower130 HP
240 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank56 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord Mondeo
4635 mmLength4731 mm
1762 mmWidth1812 mm
1466 mmHeight1429 mm
1440 KgWeight1460 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2754 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…