DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Saab 9-3 vs 2006 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 6
SaabMakeMazda
9-3Model6
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 6
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
210 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
240 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank64 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 6
4635 mmLength4710 mm
1762 mmWidth1780 mm
1466 mmHeight1480 mm
1440 KgWeight1520 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Saab 9-3 and 2006 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…