DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mazda 6 vs 2006 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationSaab 9-3
MazdaMakeSaab
6Model9-3
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationSaab 9-3
9,8 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
201 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
360 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16 HTyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationSaab 9-3
4710 mmLength4635 mm
1780 mmWidth1762 mm
1480 mmHeight1466 mm
1520 KgWeight1440 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mazda 6 and 2006 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…