DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Saab 9-3 vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo C30
SaabMakeVolvo
9-3ModelC30
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo C30
8,4 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
210 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
175 HPPower177 HP
265 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo C30
4635 mmLength4266 mm
1762 mmWidth1782 mm
1466 mmHeight1447 mm
1440 KgWeight1451 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Saab 9-3 and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…