DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Rover MGF vs 1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeMercedes-Benz
MGFModelE Serisi
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,7 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
212 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
145 HPPower136 HP
174 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank72 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3913 mmLength4765 mm
1628 mmWidth1765 mm
1264 mmHeight1490 mm
1060 KgWeight1470 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Rover MGF and 1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…