DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 BMW Z3 vs 1996 Rover MGF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationRover MGF
BMWMakeRover
Z3ModelMGF
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationRover MGF
10,5 s0–100 km/h7,7 s
194 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
115 HPPower145 HP
168 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationRover MGF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationRover MGF
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationRover MGF
4025 mmLength3913 mm
1692 mmWidth1628 mm
1288 mmHeight1264 mm
1160 KgWeight1060 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 BMW Z3 and 1996 Rover MGF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…