DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Rover MGF vs 1996 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeLand Rover
MGFModelDiscovery
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

7,7 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
212 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
145 HPPower134 HP
174 NmTorque312 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank89 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption14,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3913 mmLength4524 mm
1628 mmWidth1810 mm
1264 mmHeight1960 mm
1060 KgWeight2020 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Rover MGF and 1996 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…