DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover MGF vs 2000 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover MGFSpecificationVolvo S40
RoverMakeVolvo
MGFModelS40
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Rover MGFSpecificationVolvo S40
9,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
120 HPPower122 HP
160 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover MGFSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover MGFSpecificationVolvo S40
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover MGFSpecificationVolvo S40
3913 mmLength4516 mm
1628 mmWidth1716 mm
1464 mmHeight1422 mm
1060 KgWeight1230 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover MGF and 2000 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…