DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover MGF vs 2000 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeOpel
MGFModelVectra
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
193 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3913 mmLength4495 mm
1628 mmWidth1707 mm
1464 mmHeight1425 mm
1060 KgWeight1265 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover MGF and 2000 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…