DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover MGF vs 2000 Mazda Capella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeMazda
MGFModelCapella
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3913 mmLength4575 mm
1628 mmWidth1695 mm
1464 mmHeight1440 mm
1060 KgWeight1210 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover MGF and 2000 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…