DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Rover MGF vs 1995 Mazda Protege Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeMazda
MGFModelProtege
1995Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3913 mmLength4175 mm
1628 mmWidth1665 mm
1464 mmHeight1480 mm
1060 KgWeight1010 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Rover MGF and 1995 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…