DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Seat Toledo vs 1995 Rover MGF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeRover
ToledoModelMGF
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
170 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4321 mmLength3913 mm
1662 mmWidth1628 mm
1424 mmHeight1464 mm
1225 KgWeight1060 Kg
2471 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Seat Toledo and 1995 Rover MGF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…