DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Rover Maestro vs 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Maestro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeMitsubishi
MaestroModelSpace Runner
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
167 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
86 HPPower82 HP
132 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 86 HTyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4000 mmLength4270 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1665 mm
975 KgWeight1260 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Rover Maestro and 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Maestro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…