DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Seat Toledo vs 1992 Rover Maestro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Maestro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeRover
ToledoModelMaestro
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

16,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
165 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
68 HPPower86 HP
150 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R 13Tyre size185/55 R15 86 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4321 mmLength4000 mm
1662 mmWidth1690 mm
1424 mmHeight1430 mm
1050 KgWeight975 Kg
2471 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Seat Toledo and 1992 Rover Maestro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Maestro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…