DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 75 vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeLand Rover
75ModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
220 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
177 HPPower177 HP
240 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4747 mmLength4433 mm
1778 mmWidth1809 mm
1424 mmHeight1709 mm
1445 KgWeight1550 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 75 and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…