2003 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 V6 TDI (150 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
2003 Opel Omega vs 2003 Rover 75 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.5 V6 (177 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationRover 75
OpelMakeRover
OmegaModel75
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationRover 75
11,0 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
206 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
150 HPPower177 HP
300 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationRover 75
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationRover 75
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationRover 75
4898 mmLength4747 mm
1775 mmWidth1778 mm
1450 mmHeight1424 mm
1610 KgWeight1445 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2746 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Opel Omega and 2003 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…