2000 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.5 V6 (177 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
2000 Rover 75 vs 1999 Toyota Windom Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Toyota
Windom
Toyota Windom 2.5 i V6 24V (175 Hp) 1999Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationToyota Windom
RoverMakeToyota
75ModelWindom
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationToyota Windom
8,5 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
177 HPPower175 HP
240 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationToyota Windom
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationToyota Windom
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationToyota Windom
4747 mmLength4780 mm
1778 mmWidth1780 mm
1424 mmHeight1390 mm
1445 KgWeight1500 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Rover 75 and 1999 Toyota Windom approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…