DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Rover 75 vs 2000 Rover 75 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationRover 75
RoverMakeRover
75Model75
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationRover 75
8,5 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
220 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
177 HPPower177 HP
240 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationRover 75
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationRover 75
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationRover 75
4747 mmLength4747 mm
1778 mmWidth1778 mm
1424 mmHeight1424 mm
1445 KgWeight1445 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Rover 75 and 2000 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…