2003 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.0 CDT (115 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
2003 Rover 75 vs 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 16V GDI (122 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
RoverMakeMitsubishi
75ModelCarisma
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
11,7 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
115 HPPower122 HP
260 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4747 mmLength4475 mm
1778 mmWidth1710 mm
1424 mmHeight1405 mm
1485 KgWeight1215 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 75 and 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…