DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2003 Rover 75 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRover
CarismaModel75
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1951 cc
122 HPPower115 HP
174 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength4747 mm
1710 mmWidth1778 mm
1405 mmHeight1424 mm
1215 KgWeight1485 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2003 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…