DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 75 vs 2002 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationVolvo S40
RoverMakeVolvo
75ModelS40
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationVolvo S40
11,7 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
115 HPPower122 HP
260 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationVolvo S40
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationVolvo S40
4747 mmLength4516 mm
1778 mmWidth1716 mm
1424 mmHeight1422 mm
1485 KgWeight1230 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 75 and 2002 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…