DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Rover 75 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 75
SaabMakeRover
9-3Model75
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 75
11,0 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1951 cc
130 HPPower115 HP
177 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 75
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 75
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 75
4629 mmLength4747 mm
1711 mmWidth1778 mm
1428 mmHeight1424 mm
1295 KgWeight1485 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…