DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 75 vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationSaab 9-3
RoverMakeSaab
75Model9-3
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationSaab 9-3
11,7 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
115 HPPower130 HP
260 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationSaab 9-3
4747 mmLength4629 mm
1778 mmWidth1711 mm
1424 mmHeight1428 mm
1485 KgWeight1295 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 75 and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…