2000 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.0 CDT (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Rover 75 vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Renault
Laguna
Renault Laguna 2.0 (B56C/H/N) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationRenault Laguna
RoverMakeRenault
75ModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationRenault Laguna
11,7 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower113 HP
260 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationRenault Laguna
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank66 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationRenault Laguna
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationRenault Laguna
4747 mmLength4508 mm
1778 mmWidth1752 mm
1424 mmHeight1432 mm
1485 KgWeight1255 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Rover 75 and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…