2000 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.0 CDT (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Rover 75 vs 2000 Mazda MX-6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
MX-6
Mazda MX-6 2.0 i 16V (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationMazda MX-6
RoverMakeMazda
75ModelMX-6
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationMazda MX-6
11,7 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
193 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
260 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationMazda MX-6
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationMazda MX-6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 88 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationMazda MX-6
4747 mmLength4615 mm
1778 mmWidth1750 mm
1424 mmHeight1310 mm
1485 KgWeight1120 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Rover 75 and 2000 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…