DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Rover 75 vs 2004 Seat Altea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationSeat Altea
RoverMakeSeat
75ModelAltea
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationSeat Altea
9,1 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
210 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
215 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationSeat Altea
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationSeat Altea
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationSeat Altea
4747 mmLength4280 mm
1778 mmWidth1768 mm
1424 mmHeight1568 mm
1420 KgWeight1430 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Rover 75 and 2004 Seat Altea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…