DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2004 Rover 75 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeRover
156Model75
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
305 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4441 mmLength4747 mm
1743 mmWidth1778 mm
1458 mmHeight1424 mm
1510 KgWeight1420 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…