DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Rover 75 vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeAlfa Romeo
75Model156
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
215 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
195/65 R16Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4747 mmLength4441 mm
1778 mmWidth1743 mm
1424 mmHeight1458 mm
1420 KgWeight1510 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Rover 75 and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…