2002 • Rover
75
Rover 75 1.8 16V T (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
2002 Rover 75 vs 2002 Nissan Laurel Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Nissan
Laurel
Nissan Laurel 2.0 24V (155 Hp) 2002Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Laurel
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationNissan Laurel
RoverMakeNissan
75ModelLaurel
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationNissan Laurel
9,1 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower155 HP
215 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationNissan Laurel
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationNissan Laurel
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationNissan Laurel
4747 mmLength4765 mm
1778 mmWidth1730 mm
1424 mmHeight1400 mm
1420 KgWeight1390 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Rover 75 and 2002 Nissan Laurel approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…