2002 • Nissan
Laurel
Nissan Laurel 2.0 24V (155 Hp) 2002Overall Score66.25/100
2002 Nissan Laurel vs 2002 Rover 75 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Rover
75
Rover 75 1.8 16V T (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Laurel
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan LaurelSpecificationRover 75
NissanMakeRover
LaurelModel75
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan LaurelSpecificationRover 75
—0–100 km/h9,1 s
190 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
155 HPPower150 HP
186 NmTorque215 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan LaurelSpecificationRover 75
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
13 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan LaurelSpecificationRover 75
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan LaurelSpecificationRover 75
4765 mmLength4747 mm
1730 mmWidth1778 mm
1400 mmHeight1424 mm
1390 KgWeight1420 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2746 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Nissan Laurel and 2002 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…