DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 75 vs 2002 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationAudi A3
RoverMakeAudi
75ModelA3
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationAudi A3
9,1 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
210 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
150 HPPower125 HP
215 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationAudi A3
4747 mmLength4152 mm
1778 mmWidth1735 mm
1424 mmHeight1427 mm
1420 KgWeight1160 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 75 and 2002 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…