DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Rover 75 vs 2004 Honda Civic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationHonda Civic
RoverMakeHonda
75ModelCivic
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationHonda Civic
11,6 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
195 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
120 HPPower99 HP
160 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationHonda Civic
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationHonda Civic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/55 R16 93 WTyre size195/60 R15; 205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationHonda Civic
4747 mmLength4140 mm
1778 mmWidth1695 mm
1424 mmHeight1440 mm
1445 KgWeight1265 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Rover 75 and 2004 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…