DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 75 vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeRenault
75ModelScenic
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
195 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
120 HPPower98 HP
160 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/55 R16 93 WTyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4747 mmLength4425 mm
1778 mmWidth1775 mm
1424 mmHeight1720 mm
1445 KgWeight1485 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 75 and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…