DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Megane vs 2003 Rover 75 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRover
MeganeModel75
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
107 HPPower120 HP
148 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size215/55 R16 93 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4082 mmLength4747 mm
1698 mmWidth1778 mm
1368 mmHeight1424 mm
1125 KgWeight1445 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Megane and 2003 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…