2003 • Rover
75
Rover 75 1.8 (120 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
2003 Rover 75 vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 1.6i 16V (107 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationRenault Megane
RoverMakeRenault
75ModelMegane
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationRenault Megane
11,6 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower107 HP
160 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationRenault Megane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/55 R16 93 WTyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationRenault Megane
4747 mmLength4082 mm
1778 mmWidth1698 mm
1424 mmHeight1368 mm
1445 KgWeight1125 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2468 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 75 and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…