DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 45 vs 2003 Nissan Prairie Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Prairie

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeNissan
45ModelPrairie
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
185 NmTorque181 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
14 ltUrban consumption14 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/45 R16 VTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4517 mmLength4545 mm
1696 mmWidth1690 mm
1394 mmHeight1630 mm
1340 KgWeight1490 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 45 and 2003 Nissan Prairie approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Prairie leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…