DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia OptimaSpecificationRover 45
KiaMakeRover
OptimaModel45
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Kia OptimaSpecificationRover 45
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
195 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
149 HPPower150 HP
193 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Kia OptimaSpecificationRover 45
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia OptimaSpecificationRover 45
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size205/45 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia OptimaSpecificationRover 45
4745 mmLength4517 mm
1815 mmWidth1696 mm
1420 mmHeight1394 mm
1405 KgWeight1340 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…