DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 45 vs 2003 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 45SpecificationFord Focus
RoverMakeFord
45ModelFocus
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Rover 45SpecificationFord Focus
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
150 HPPower131 HP
185 NmTorque183 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 45SpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
14 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 45SpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R16 VTyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 45SpecificationFord Focus
4517 mmLength4526 mm
1696 mmWidth1699 mm
1394 mmHeight1448 mm
1340 KgWeight1275 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2616 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 45 and 2003 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…