2003 • Rover
45
Rover 45 2.0 i V6 24V (150 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
2003 Rover 45 vs 2003 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.0 i 16V (129 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 45SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
RoverMakeChevrolet
45ModelTracker
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Rover 45SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower129 HP
185 NmTorque182 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 45SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank56 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 45SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R16 VTyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 45SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4517 mmLength3780 mm
1696 mmWidth1694 mm
1394 mmHeight1689 mm
1340 KgWeight1180 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 45 and 2003 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…