2002 • Rover
45
Rover 45 1.8i 16V (117 Hp) 2002Overall Score57.25/100
2002 Rover 45 vs 2002 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.8 (125 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Rover 45
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 45SpecificationFord Mondeo
RoverMakeFord
45ModelMondeo
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Rover 45SpecificationFord Mondeo
9,3 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
193 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
117 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 45SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 45SpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 45SpecificationFord Mondeo
4517 mmLength4731 mm
1696 mmWidth1812 mm
1395 mmHeight1429 mm
1230 KgWeight1373 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2754 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Rover 45 and 2002 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…