2002 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.8 (125 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
2002 Ford Mondeo vs 2002 Rover 45 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Rover
45
Rover 45 1.8i 16V (117 Hp) 2002Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Rover 45
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 45
FordMakeRover
MondeoModel45
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 45
10,8 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
205 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower117 HP
170 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 45
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 45
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 45
4731 mmLength4517 mm
1812 mmWidth1696 mm
1429 mmHeight1395 mm
1373 KgWeight1230 Kg
2754 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Mondeo and 2002 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…