DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 45 vs 2000 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 45SpecificationVolvo S40
RoverMakeVolvo
45ModelS40
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 45SpecificationVolvo S40
9,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1783 cc
117 HPPower122 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 45SpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 45SpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 45SpecificationVolvo S40
4517 mmLength4516 mm
1696 mmWidth1716 mm
1395 mmHeight1422 mm
1230 KgWeight1255 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 45 and 2000 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…