2003 • Rover
45
Rover 45 1.4 i 16V (103 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
2003 Rover 45 vs 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Rover 45
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 45SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
RoverMakeMitsubishi
45ModelLancer
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Rover 45SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
11,2 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
185 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
103 HPPower98 HP
123 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 45SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 45SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14 TTyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 45SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4517 mmLength4485 mm
1696 mmWidth1695 mm
1395 mmHeight1480 mm
1180 KgWeight1360 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 45 and 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…