DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Space Star vs 2003 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRover
Space StarModel45
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
98 HPPower103 HP
150 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength4517 mm
1715 mmWidth1696 mm
1515 mmHeight1395 mm
1235 KgWeight1180 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Space Star and 2003 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…