1995 • Rover
400
Rover 400 2.0 i (136 Hp) 1995Overall Score58.5/100
1995 Rover 400 vs 1995 Audi Cabriolet Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Audi
Cabriolet
Audi Cabriolet 2.0 E (115 Hp) 1995Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Rover 400
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 400SpecificationAudi Cabriolet
RoverMakeAudi
400ModelCabriolet
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Rover 400SpecificationAudi Cabriolet
8,7 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
200 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
136 HPPower115 HP
185 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 400SpecificationAudi Cabriolet
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
8 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 400SpecificationAudi Cabriolet
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 400SpecificationAudi Cabriolet
4365 mmLength4366 mm
1680 mmWidth1716 mm
1390 mmHeight1379 mm
1210 KgWeight1350 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2556 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Rover 400 and 1995 Audi Cabriolet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…