DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
AudiMakeRover
80Model400
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
12,2 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
186 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
115 HPPower136 HP
165 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
4482 mmLength4365 mm
1695 mmWidth1680 mm
1408 mmHeight1390 mm
1270 KgWeight1210 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…