DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Rover 400 vs 1995 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
RoverMakeAudi
400Model80
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
8,7 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
200 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
136 HPPower115 HP
185 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
8 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
4365 mmLength4482 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1408 mm
1210 KgWeight1270 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Rover 400 and 1995 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…